 |
 |
| WEIGHT: |
| 500 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 58 mm x58 mm x35 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 310 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Too severe material for machining |
|
 |
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 20 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| ø 32 mm x h 7 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 316L |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| MIM |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Not feasible with other technologies (see sharpened edges and the 0,2 mm fissures) |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 700 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 115 mm x 95 mm x 30 mm |
| STEEL: |
| 18NiCrMo5 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Too expensive geometry for other technologies |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 15 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| ø 28 mm x h 8 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 316L |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| MIM |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Dimensions and geometry details |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 270 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 100 mm x 65 mm x 20 mm |
| STEEL: |
| 40CrMo4 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Too low quantity to justify the price for a forging mould |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 17 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| ø 20 mm x h 15 mm |
| STEEL: |
| FN08 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| MIM |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Teeth precision, finishing and low weight could not be easily obtain with investment casting. MIM was perfect
|
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 18 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 45 mm x 22 mm x 32 mm |
| STEEL: |
| 42CrMo4 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| MIM |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Only feasible with expensive machining technologies. too low Roughness (Ra: 1,2) for investment casting |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 1,2 Kg |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| ø 180 mm x h 90 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 316 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Sand casting unable to reach required roughness (Ra 3.2). |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 12 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 34 mm x 11 mm x 16 mm |
| STEEL: |
| 17-4PH |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| MIM |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Geometry details and dimensional precision. MIM can guarantee better results than investment casting. |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 10 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 55 mm x 30 mm x 30 mm |
| STEEL: |
| 50CrV4 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| If MIM was used, too many deformation could have occurred.
Final calibration was due, but starting with investment casting was cheaper |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 290 gr |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| 82 mm x55 mm x 40 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 304 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| No more welding between flange and pipe required. Casted part is a single part. |
|
|
 |
|
| WEIGHT: |
| 2,2 Kg |
| DIMENSIONS: |
| ø 150 mm x h 140 mm |
| STEEL: |
| AISI 420 |
| CHOSEN PROCESS: |
| Investment casting |
| REASON OF OUR CHOICE: |
| Complex geometry and precision could not be achieved with other technologies. |
|
